Behind the Scenes 2015
We believe having fun while we work leads to better pictures. This blog post gives you a peek behind the camera to see how we capture weddings. Enjoy!
This image was one of many at a friend's wedding. We saw rain in the forecast and knew we were going to create a special image that night. As we do at most weddings, we test a shot before we bringing the couple out. Sometimes people join us and end up in the test shots!
For this shot we upped the quality and creativity of our night shot by incorporating a canoe, bathing suits, and umbrellas. What you cannot see in this image below is Kaitlin positioning the canoe while treading water and holding a flash. It was a lot of work getting this in a rainstorm, but what we ended up with is one of our most popular images ever taken.
To get some of the special shots we take, we need to be willing to climb trees, shimmy up roofs, and hang out of car windows. The next set of images shows us taking the picture and the resulting image from that position.
Kaitlin and I are not just photographers, but also school teachers. We think the kids sense this and are often drawn to us while we are taking pictures.
Sometimes people give us funny things and we of course use them to fit right in.
Many people want to take our picture, but sometimes when they try, the results are blurry.
I have been bit by a tick two years running now. Gross! I wonder why this happens?
When we work, we try to be part of the crowd and not the center of attention. Sometimes it is like a Where's Waldo trying to find one another.
When the wedding moves to the reception, we quickly setup our flashes and take one or two test shots. We try to do something original each time.
Kaitlin always finds a mirror during the day to add a picture for me to find while I am editing.
Finding a spot for group shots and organizing people can be challenging, but with Kaitlin directing the way, it has become very easy.
Photography is a relationship business first and connections with people are constantly being made throughout the day. We love working with brides, grooms, families, friends, D.Js, event staff and each other. We were fortunate enough this year to be a part of many weddings that contained new and old friends and without a doubt, we will see some of them at our 2016 weddings.
When we see a photo booth at a wedding, we wait for the perfect time and jump in for a few candids!
As the night ends, and the bride and groom have a bit more time to work with us, we usually grab them for an intimate shot. Once again, Kaitlin becomes the model and has more glamor shots than anybody I know.
That's it! I hope you enjoyed your backstage pass into the Korver Photography brother and sister team!
Comments
==================================================
The short explanation
Security and Smart Contract Risks Around New Coins is a question best approached through market structure rather than price predictions. This guide concentrates on how ecosystem risk extends beyond the launchpad interface. The focus is StonkFun, a Solana-based token launchpad where newly created coins can be paired with different supported quote assets. For readers searching terms such as stonksfun or stonks xyz, the important task is to understand what the platform does and where the risks remain. No launch mechanism can guarantee liquidity, earnings or a favorable trading outcome.
To understand security and smart contract risks around new coins, begin with how ecosystem risk extends beyond the launchpad interface. This shifts attention from a promotional slogan to an observable feature of how a market operates. Tokenized stocks are a particularly easy topic to misunderstand. A coin quoted in a token linked to an equity is still a separate crypto asset. The legal rights and redemption rules of the quote product require independent analysis, and a trading pair does not confer ordinary shareholder rights.
Inside the workflow
One practical way to approach this subject is to examine contract bugs, malicious approvals and liquidity stress create separate threat categories. The difference matters because two similar-looking charts can represent very different risks. Safety analysis should include realistic execution conditions. A small headline market capitalization may look attractive, yet it can coexist with a thin pool where even moderate selling causes large slippage. Liquidity can disappear quickly during market stress.
Reading the evidence
An often overlooked aspect is only use wallet permissions that you understand. Readers can use this distinction to ask sharper questions instead of relying on hype. A practical comparison should focus on user-visible mechanisms: which quote tokens are supported, how markets launch, what fees apply, and what happens when initial liquidity moves to a different stage. Brand popularity alone is too narrow a basis for choosing a tool.
Final perspective
For a grounded assessment, Contract bugs, malicious approvals and liquidity stress create separate threat categories. At the same time, only use wallet permissions that you understand. A search for stonk launch xyz may lead to similarly named projects, so use verified contract and product details instead of assuming that spelling alone identifies a particular token. This is educational context, not trading advice or a recommendation to buy any digital asset.
=====================================
The short explanation
StonkFun Buybacks and Burns Explained is a question best approached through market structure rather than price predictions. This guide concentrates on how token repurchases and supply reductions can form part of a flywheel. The focus is StonkFun, a Solana-based token launchpad where newly created coins can be paired with different supported quote assets. For readers searching terms such as stonckfun or stonks fun, the important task is to understand what the platform does and where the risks remain. No launch mechanism can guarantee liquidity, earnings or a favorable trading outcome.
One practical way to approach this subject is to examine how token repurchases and supply reductions can form part of a flywheel. The difference matters because two similar-looking charts can represent very different risks. Fee allocation can vary by launch mode and stage of a market. The stated creator share on one screen is not automatically a universal commission across every product or every date. Traders should look for current documentation and distinguish illustrative examples from guaranteed payments.
A final practical point is terminology. stonks fun can appear in search results as a shorthand or mistyped query, but it should not be used as a substitute for verifying where an asset is listed and what contract is involved. The most helpful guide clarifies these details rather than turning ambiguous search language into unsupported factual claims.
No single metric is sufficient for a new onchain token. Price, nominal market value, the number of swaps, wallet distribution and depth of available liquidity can tell different stories. Reading them together does not remove uncertainty, but it can reveal weaknesses that disappear in a one-number summary.
Inside the workflow
An often overlooked aspect is buyback transactions should be distinguished from discretionary promises. Readers can use this distinction to ask sharper questions instead of relying on hype. Neither high protocol revenue nor token burns by themselves establish that a token is underpriced. Financial claims should connect an observable mechanism to a carefully limited conclusion, rather than leap from activity to a promised return.
People researching stonckfun sometimes seek a quick verdict about safety or profitability. A better method is to define the decision first: are you studying the product, considering the mechanics of a launch, or observing market activity? The right evidence differs for each question. A good explanation should leave the reader better equipped to verify claims independently.
The surrounding Solana environment also affects how token repurchases and supply reductions can form part of a flywheel. Network transaction fees, execution routes, the behavior of the quote asset and pool depth may all influence the result a wallet user experiences. Even when the application interface makes the process feel simple, the transaction remains part of an open and sometimes volatile market.
Reading the evidence
The discussion becomes more useful when it focuses on buyback activity does not guarantee a particular market outcome. It is worth separating an interface description from the results a user may actually experience. Time frames matter. A single active day can dominate a weekly average, while a cumulative figure keeps growing as historical activity accumulates. Analysts should label every number with its period and avoid extrapolating a brief surge into an annual guarantee.
Consider what would falsify a bold claim about buyback activity does not guarantee a particular market outcome. An onchain transfer, a published fee schedule or a consistently observed market event might confirm one narrow statement while leaving the larger conclusion unresolved. That is why reliable educational coverage uses precise language such as “may,” “depends on,” and “subject to current terms” where certainty is not justified.
It is also useful to maintain a small research log: note the date, the trading pair, the token mint, the source of any fee estimate and the liquidity conditions observed. With that information, subsequent changes are easier to explain. Without it, yesterday’s screenshot may be mistaken for today’s applicable terms.
Final perspective
For a grounded assessment, Buyback transactions should be distinguished from discretionary promises. At the same time, buyback activity does not guarantee a particular market outcome. A search for stonk xyz may lead to similarly named projects, so use verified contract and product details instead of assuming that spelling alone identifies a particular token. This is educational context, not trading advice or a recommendation to buy any digital asset.